Hi,
I'm hoping someone can help me understand the benefit of the setup below. It was set up by a third party.
In this config, there are no overlapping IP address and there are 2 xSVMs which are members of the 'Default' IPspace
- The Default Broadcast Domain (BD) and Failover Group (FG) contains offline ports, so a redundant configuration
- The 'Cluster-Management' BD and FG contains both the physical and VLAN ports
- There is a dedicated BD and FG 'Data' for all of the physical ports in use
- The 'SVM%-Data' BD and FGs contain only the VLAN ports
Vserver | Group | Targets |
------ | -------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
CLUSTER | ||
Cluster-Management | ||
N01:e0M, | ||
N01:e0e-1111, | ||
N01:e0f-1111, | ||
N01:e0g-1111, | ||
N01:e0h-1111, | ||
N02:e0M, | ||
N02:e0e-1111, | ||
N02:e0f-1111, | ||
N02:e0g-1111, | ||
N02:e0h-1111 | ||
Data | ||
N01:e0e, | ||
N01:e0f, | ||
N01:e0g, | ||
N01:e0h, | ||
N02:e0e, | ||
N02:e0f, | ||
N02:e0g, | ||
N02:e0h | ||
Default | ||
N01:e0c, | ||
N01:e0d, | ||
N02:e0c, | ||
N02:e0d | ||
SVM2-Data | ||
N01:e0e-2222, | ||
N01:e0f-2222, | ||
N01:e0g-2222, | ||
N01:e0h-2222, | ||
N02:e0e-2222, | ||
N02:e0f-2222, | ||
N02:e0g-2222, | ||
N02:e0h-2222 | ||
SVM1-Data | ||
N01:e0e-3333, | ||
N01:e0f-3333, | ||
N01:e0g-3333, | ||
N01:e0h-3333, | ||
N02:e0e-3333, | ||
N02:e0f-3333, | ||
N02:e0g-3333, | ||
N02:e0h-3333 | ||
SVM2-Management | ||
N01:e0e-4444, | ||
N01:e0f-4444, | ||
N01:e0g-4444, | ||
N01:e0h-4444, | ||
N02:e0e-4444, | ||
N02:e0f-4444, | ||
N02:e0g-4444, | ||
N02:e0h-4444 | ||
SVM1-Management | ||
N01:e0e-5555, | ||
N01:e0f-5555, | ||
N01:e0g-5555, | ||
N01:e0h-5555, | ||
N02:e0e-5555, | ||
N02:e0f-5555, | ||
N02:e0g-5555, | ||
N02:e0h-5555 |
- Is there any reason to deviate from using the 'Default' Broadcast Domain and Failover Group?
- Should the asscoated VLAN and physical ports that the LIFS are allowed to fail over to be contained in the same BD/FG?
Thanks