Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4962

SVM DR (‑identity‑preserve ture) , can implement with (on-box) DNS Load Balancing?

Hi

 

Well, The question is more Microsoft oriented – but I couldn’t find a MS resource (except https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771640(v=ws.11).aspx   -   Understanding Zone Delegation).

 

NetApp relevant TR’s not saying it specifically, and I want to make sure my implementation is right:

https://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4523.pdf  -   DNS Load Balancing in ONTAP Configuration and Best Practices

https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP12462587  - Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3 SVM Disaster Recovery Preparation Express Guide

https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP12454817   - Clustered Data ONTAP® 8.3 Data Protection Guide

 

Is it safe to add the DR LIF ip as name server to the DNS delegation?  or that might create performance or other intermitted issues? (depends I guess how MS doing the load spread between these servers)

Should I maybe not use it on the SVM DR and just use classic  dynamic DNS?

 

 Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
KX.png

 

 

Thanks


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4962

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>